<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:29:28 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Clean Tech News / Updates</title><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Fueling California Issues "Projected Outlook For Next Generation and Alternative Transportation Fuels in California 2010-2030"</title><category>Biofuels</category><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:14:33 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2011/6/9/fueling-california-issues-projected-outlook-for-next-generat.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:11747858</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>"California is a global leader in the development of alternative fuels and alternative fuel vehicle technologies largely due to historic state policies and investment trends. Concomitantly, three principal forcing functions have driven worldwide efforts for the development of new transportation fuels and vehicle technologies as alternatives to petroleum-based fuels and the internal combustion engine:</p>
<p><br />1. Global climate instability caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions<br />2. The need for long-term energy security (including energy independence)<br />3. Urban air pollution caused by criteria pollutant emissions from combustion of fossil fuels"</p>
<p>To view the report, please visit:<br /><a href="http://www.fuelingcalifornia.org/docs/Fueling%20CA%20Next%20Gen%20Alt%20Fuels%20Final%20May%202011.pdf">http://www.fuelingcalifornia.org/docs/Fueling%20CA%20Next%20Gen%20Alt%20Fuels%20Final%20May%202011.pdf</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-11747858.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>NYSERDA TO AWARD UP TO $6 MILLION IN GRANTS FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERRED POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES</title><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:08:07 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2011/3/10/nyserda-to-award-up-to-6-million-in-grants-for-environmental.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:10743642</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (&ldquo;NYSERDA&rdquo;) is seeking proposals to develop and demonstrate innovative renewable and other environmentally preferred power technologies, or technologies that improve performance, power quality and reliability of power systems.&nbsp; This solicitation is focused on advancing and developing promising technologies and products that will lead to the successful commercialization of products manufactured in New York State, and increasing markets for these products through strategic demonstration projects and dissemination of results.</p>
<p>This solicitation includes the following three categories of projects.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Category A: Early Stage Product Development, Demonstration Feasibility Assessments, or Technology Facilitation Studies (up to $200,000 of NYSERDA funding per project).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Category B: New Product Development (up to $1,000,000 of NYSERDA funding per project; projects must be phased with no phase exceeding $500,000 of NYSERDA funding).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Category C: Demonstration Projects (up to $750,000 of NYSERDA funding per project).</p>
<p>Up to $6 million in funds is available to fund approved projects.&nbsp; The deadline for submissions is May 16, 2011, no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.</p>
<p>Interested parties may contact NYSERDA by calling 1-866-NYSERDA (1-866-697-3732) toll-free; in New York state, the telephone number is 518-862-1090.&nbsp; Project team members include Jennifer Harvey at extension 3264, Barry Liebowitz at extension 3248 and Richard Drake at extension 3258.&nbsp; For further information, please visit <a href="http://www.nyserda.org/funding/2244pon.asp">http://www.nyserda.org/funding/2244pon.asp</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-10743642.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Obama Proposes ‘Green Energy’ Incentives</title><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:54:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2011/2/3/obama-proposes-green-energy-incentives.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:10348366</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>As foreshadowed by his recent State of the Union address, this week Barack Obama proposed to cut oil and gas subsidies to make way for new &ldquo;green energy&rdquo; tax incentives designed to encourage US businesses to upgrade their commercial buildings and make them more efficient.&nbsp; According to the White House, the program is intended to spur job growth in the construction industry and make commercial buildings 20% more energy efficient by 2020.&nbsp; The program will be included as part of Obama's upcoming budget proposal.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-10348366.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Carol Browner to Depart White House</title><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2011/1/25/carol-browner-to-depart-white-house.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:10235506</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>1/25/11, <em>The New York Times</em>, "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2011/01/25/25climatewire-browner-to-relinquish-role-as-energy-and-clim-3904.html">Browner to Relinquish Role as Energy and Climate Czar</a>"</p>
<p>1/25/11, The Hill, "<a href="thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/140015-analyst-browner-exit-shows-softening-of-obama-green-agenda%22">Analyst: Browner exit shows 'softening' of Obama green agenda</a>"</p>
<p>Carol Browner, assistant to the president for energy and climate change, has resigned her position, which analysts are speculating signals a shift in White House environmental policy. <em>The Hill</em> reports that FBR Capital Markets stated they believe "her resignation on the eve of the State of the Union is another signal that the Obama Administration may be softening its approach to environmental regulations, especially those aimed at raising prices and/or reducing fossil fuel consumption." An unnamed "Virginia-based investment house," according to <em>The Hill</em>, commented "We expect the President to use tonight's State of the Union speech to continue exploring common ground with Republicans including regulatory reform, clean energy, manufacturing competitiveness, and research and development. This should be viewed as positive for fossil fuel and particularly coal companies, which faced a slew of regulatory issues including mountaintop mining, coal ash, the Clean Air Transport Rule, and a utility MACT [maximum achievable control technology] rule." <em>The New York Times</em> reports that energy lobbyist Scott Segal commented "Carol Browner was a passionate contributor to a strong White House commitment to environmental policy," he said. "Her departure may be part of a legitimate effort to pay careful attention to addressing some of the real regulatory obstacles in the way of job creation in the United States." The <em>Times</em> also noted that Browner's "departure from the White House is something of a surprise. While it was widely assumed that she was going to reduce her energy and environment portfolio, Browner was expected to stay on in another role, perhaps as a deputy chief of staff. But the fact that she had not been vetted by the Senate for her current position continued to rankle Republicans, who had threatened to call her in to testify in this new Congress, particularly about her work on the climate bill."</p>
<ul>
<li>The <a href="online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703555804576102810159169324.html?KEYWORDS=EPA&quot;"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a><em> </em>reported that a "Democrat close to the White House said there is 'no question' that Ms. Browner's post would be eliminated. Asked why, he noted that cabinet secretaries do not like having high-level policy officials at the White House working in their fields. He also said the job will be eliminated 'because there will be no climate or carbon bill in the next two years.'" The <em>Journal</em> also notes that the resignation "comes at a time when the White House is reaching out to business leaders on several fronts. Democrats familiar with the White House thinking cited other reasons for the step. But eliminating the energy czar post would likely be welcomed by many business leaders, who view Ms. Browner as a leading advocate for environmental regulations they oppose."</li>
</ul>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-10235506.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>US Supreme Court to Review Climate Change Tort Case Against Utilities</title><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2010/12/10/us-supreme-court-to-review-climate-change-tort-case-against.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:9696916</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>On December 6, 2010, the US Supreme Court agreed to review a decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing eight states and others to bring suit against certain utilities to prohibit the emissions of greenhouse gases.&nbsp; The lower court decision, Connecticut et al., v. American Electric Power Corp., 582 F.3d 309 (2d Cir. 2009), had allowed eight states, the City of New York, and three private land trusts to sue the power plants on the ground that &ldquo;greenhouse gas&rdquo; emissions are a &ldquo;nuisance&rdquo; under federal law.&nbsp; Their complaint alleges that emissions from six of the nation&rsquo;s largest electric utilities are causing climate change that harms each of the plaintiffs.&nbsp; The case is likely to be heard by the Supreme Court next spring, and a decision could come in June, before the end of the Court&rsquo;s current term.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-9696916.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Proposed Revisions to Green Chemistry Program Regulations Draw Criticism</title><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2010/12/8/proposed-revisions-to-green-chemistry-program-regulations-dr.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:9696910</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Environmentalists and public health advocates are criticizing the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) for allegedly weakening California's Green Chemistry Initiative. Under that program, enacted in 2008, the DTSC is directed to identify and regulate the use of toxic chemicals in consumer products.&nbsp; The DTSC's recently proposed revisions to regulations has generated criticism and threats of litigation, particularly in connection with proposed exemptions for micro concentrations of substances like bisphenol A and lead, as well as the limited scope of the proposed regulations, which would require evaluations of only household cleaners, personal care products, and products for children. Ansje Miller, the campaign director for Californians for a Healthy and Green Economy, also suggested that the revisions would make it easier for manufacturers to replace known toxins could be adopted as early as January.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-9696910.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Port of Los Angeles Completes One Megawatt Solar Project on Rooftop of World Cruise Center</title><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2010/12/3/port-of-los-angeles-completes-one-megawatt-solar-project-on.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:9696902</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The Port of Los Angeles has completed its 1 megawatt solar rooftop project atop the 71,500 square foot World Cruise Center.&nbsp; The system will be capable of generating approximately 1.2 million kilowatt hours of electricity annually to the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) energy grid. The system is projected to result in an annual $200,000 energy cost savings, and is the first phase of a multi-location solar power program that eventually could produce 10 megawatts of solar system generation capacity. The $10.8 million project includes a total of 1.16 million square feet of rooftop solar panels.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-9696902.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Governor's Global Climate Summit</title><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2010/11/19/governors-global-climate-summit.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:9544150</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>On November 16, 2010, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the University of California, Davis, hosted the third annual <a href="ces.ucdavis.edu/ggcs3/">Governors&rsquo; Global Climate Summit</a> in Davis, California. At this conference, it was&nbsp; announced that an alliance of public-private entities, <a href="ces.ucdavis.edu/ggcs3/index.cfm?fuseaction=app.R20">R20</a>, had been formed to help speed the growth of the green economy. The group will work to execute low-carbon and climate-resilient projects through collaboration with state, local, and regional governments.</p>
<p>The event brought in more than 1,500 attendees from over 80 states, provinces, and nations. During the final session of the conference, our very own <a href="bryancave.com/gregorytrimarche/">Greg Trimarche</a> presented Governor Schwarzenegger with the <a href="cleantechoc.org/">CleanTech OC</a> 2010 Visionary Award. This honor was created to highlight an individual whose contributions have had a significant impact on the clean technology industry in Orange County and throughout California. &ldquo;Under Governor Schwarzenegger's leadership, California has passed groundbreaking legislation and has positioned itself as a leader in innovation and economic growth in the renewable energy and clean technology sectors for years to come,&rdquo; said Trimarche.</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 500px;" src="http://bryancavecleantech.squarespace.com/storage/post-images/Greg%20speaking%20at%20GGCS.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1290455024301" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 500px;" src="http://bryancavecleantech.squarespace.com/storage/shaking%20hands%20with%20governor.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1290455081128" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-inline ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 500px;" src="http://bryancavecleantech.squarespace.com/storage/CTOC%20hat.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1290455120472" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-9544150.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Obama Administration Considering Modifications to DOE's Loan Guarantee Program</title><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:18:48 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2010/11/17/obama-administration-considering-modifications-to-does-loan.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:9505120</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The Obama Administration is considering modifications to the DOE&rsquo;s much-criticized loan guarantee program.&nbsp; The move follows a leaked memo dated October 25, 2010 (reported by the Wall Street Journal and others), from White House officials to the President that lays out several recommendations for ways to revamp the DOE loan guarantee program. One of the recommendations from that memo was moving the remaining loan guarantee program funds to another renewable energy grant program (which essentially would end the DOE loan guarantee program).&nbsp; Under the DOE's loan guarantee program, the government's guarantee of the borrower's loan is supposed to enable the borrower to obtain better interest rates and lower costs than would otherwise be available for project financing.&nbsp; Unfortunately, DOE has been slow to approve many loan guarantees (in part, some argue, because of DOE's unreasonably risk-averse approach to the loan guarantees), and there seems to be a general consensus in the industry (including the authors of the above-mentioned memo -- Carol Browner, Larry Summers and Ron Klain) that the program hasn't been working as well as it should.&nbsp; The concept of moving the loan guarantee funds over to the renewable energy grant program was welcomed by some, because the typical length of review for the loan guarantee program is 6 months, compared to the 4 to 6 weeks for the grant program, and&nbsp; just 8 companies have received loan guarantee commitments (and another 4 received commitments and closed those deals), while 3,851 projects have received renewable energy grant funds.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-9505120.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>DOE Announces Launch of the Home Energy Score Pilot Program</title><dc:creator>Mark Carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/2010/11/12/doe-announces-launch-of-the-home-energy-score-pilot-program.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">411319:4505470:9505099</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>On November 9, 2010, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the launch of the Home Energy Score pilot program.&nbsp; The Home Energy Score is intended to offer homeowners straightforward, reliable information about their homes' energy efficiency.&nbsp; Under this program, a report will provide consumers with a home energy score between 1 and 10, and show them how their home compares to others in their region. A score of "10" represents a home with excellent energy performance, while a "1" represents a home that will benefit from major energy upgrades. Along with the score, the homeowner will receive a list of recommendations for home energy upgrades and other useful tips. For each specific improvement, the estimated utility bill savings, payback period, and greenhouse gas emission reductions will be included.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bryancavecleantech.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-9505099.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
